
Academic Journal
Q1Academy of Management Review
About Academy of Management Review
Academy of Management Review is a scholarly journal published by Academy of Management. SCImago 2025 places it in Q1 with an SJR of 9.996 and an H-index of 334.
Its listed coverage is 1976-1991, 1993-2025 and its research categories include Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous) (Q1); Management of Technology and Innovation (Q1); Strategy and Management (Q1). The 2025 dataset reports 49 documents and 1683 citations across the latest three-year reporting window.
The Academy of Management Review (AMR) is one of the most prestigious and widely recognized journals in the field of management. Published by the Academy of Management, AMR is dedicated to advancing theoretical insights and shaping the future of management studies. This peer-reviewed journal provides a platform for researchers, scholars, and professionals to explore innovative ideas and contribute to the academic discourse in business and management.
Overview of Academy of Management Review
Founded in 1976, AMR is a highly influential journal that focuses on conceptual and theoretical developments in management. Unlike empirical journals that publish data-driven research, AMR prioritizes papers that offer fresh perspectives, frameworks, and theories to deepen the understanding of management concepts. AMR is published quarterly and features articles that undergo a rigorous double-blind peer-review process, ensuring the highest academic standards. The journal's reputation for quality and impact makes it a key resource for academics, practitioners, and policymakers seeking insights into evolving management trends.Key Features of AMR
- Theoretical Focus: AMR emphasizes the development of new theories and conceptual models in management and organizational studies.
- Rigorous Review Process: The journal follows a stringent peer-review system to maintain academic excellence.
- High Impact Factor: AMR consistently ranks among the top management journals based on its citation index and influence in scholarly research.
- Diverse Topics: Articles cover a broad spectrum of management disciplines, including leadership, organizational behavior, strategy, entrepreneurship, human resources, and more.
- Interdisciplinary Approach: AMR welcomes perspectives from related fields such as psychology, sociology, economics, and political science to enhance management theories.
Why is AMR Important for Management Scholars?
1. A Source of Innovative Theories
AMR plays a crucial role in shaping management thought by publishing groundbreaking conceptual work. Researchers looking to develop or refine theories in business and management often turn to AMR for inspiration and direction.2. Contribution to Academic and Professional Growth
Scholars aiming to publish in AMR benefit from rigorous feedback and exposure to cutting-edge theoretical discussions. For professionals and practitioners, AMR articles provide valuable insights that can inform strategic decision-making and leadership practices.3. Influence on Business Education and Policy
Many of the theories and models published in AMR become foundational concepts taught in business schools worldwide. Policymakers and industry leaders also use these insights to develop best practices and innovative solutions in management.How to Submit to AMR
To maintain its high academic standards, AMR has strict submission guidelines. Authors must submit well-structured theoretical papers that provide meaningful contributions to the field. The editorial team evaluates submissions based on originality, clarity, theoretical rigor, and relevance to contemporary management challenges. For more details on submission guidelines, aspiring contributors can visit the official website of the Academy of Management.Journal Metrics
Metrics can change by reporting year. Verify time-sensitive values with the publisher or indexing service.
Aims & Scope
The Academy of Management Review (AMR) is one of the most prestigious and widely recognized journals in the field of management and organizational studies. Published by the Academy of Management (AOM), AMR primarily focuses on theoretical advancements in management and is renowned for its commitment to high-quality scholarship. This article explores the scope, significance, and contribution of AMR to the academic and business world.
What is the Academy of Management Review (AMR)?
AMR is a peer-reviewed, theory-development journal that publishes conceptual papers, literature reviews, and theoretical models in the field of management. Unlike empirical journals, AMR does not publish research studies based on data collection and analysis. Instead, it emphasizes theoretical insights that enhance our understanding of management practices and contribute to future research.Scope of AMR
AMR covers a broad range of topics within management and organizational studies. The key areas of focus include:1. Theoretical Contributions
AMR encourages the development of new theories, conceptual models, and frameworks that challenge existing paradigms and introduce novel perspectives in management science.2. Organizational Behavior and Leadership
The journal explores theories related to leadership, motivation, decision-making, organizational culture, and employee behavior, providing fresh insights into how organizations function and evolve.3. Strategy and Innovation
AMR publishes articles that examine strategic management theories, competitive advantage, business innovation, and entrepreneurship.4. Ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Sustainability
With the growing importance of ethical business practices, AMR covers theoretical discussions on business ethics, sustainability, social impact, and corporate governance.5. Human Resource Management
Topics such as talent acquisition, employee engagement, workforce diversity, and organizational development are explored through theoretical models and frameworks.6. Globalization and International Business
As businesses expand globally, AMR includes research on cross-cultural management, international business strategies, and global leadership theories.Why is AMR Important?
- Academic Influence: AMR is ranked among the top management journals and is frequently cited in academic research.
- Policy and Practice: Many business leaders, policymakers, and consultants refer to AMR for cutting-edge theoretical insights.
- Interdisciplinary Impact: The journal bridges multiple disciplines, including psychology, sociology, economics, and political science, enriching management studies.
Recent Research Articles
Latest publications matched automatically by ISSN.
Understanding Institutional Environments: A Reply to Two Dialogues from Schultz & Valentinov and Mikel-Hong
Patricia H. Thornton, Juan (“John”) Almandoz
2026-09-04 · DOI: 10.5465/amr.2026.0759Close Friends, Closer Comparisons: Regulating Envy in Multiplex Relationships
Amnah Ameen, Alexandra Rheinhardt Beer, Kyoungjo (Jo) Oh
2026-08-31 · DOI: 10.5465/amr.2024.0114A Process Model of Managerial Phronesis in the Age of Generative AI
Dirk Lindebaum, Natarajan Balasubramanian, Mehreen Ashraf, Patrick Haack et al.
2026-08-25 · DOI: 10.5465/amr.2024.0582Beyond Statically Motivated, Rational, and Atomistic Actors: Extending Tabasi-Nejad and Deutsch’s “Effect of Policy Maker Motives on Their Response to Corporate Political Activity”
Jeffrey A. Chandler, Aaron D. Hill
2026-08-21 · DOI: 10.5465/amr.2026.0077Search Heuristics Under Multiple Objectives: The Case of Corporate Social Responsibility
Daniel Albert, Felipe A. Csaszar
2026-08-19 · DOI: 10.5465/amr.2024.0178The Axiology of AI Agents: How Human-AI Interaction Transforms Values from Espoused to Enacted
Vern L. Glaser, Jennifer Sloan, Rodrigo Valadão, Evelyn R. Micelotta et al.
2026-08-18 · DOI: 10.5465/amr.2024.0494Organizational Repression of Stakeholder Collective Action
Natalie Holzaepfel, Olga Hawn, Timothy Werner
2026-08-17 · DOI: 10.5465/amr.2024.0426Attribution Error in Mutual Learning: Noise Versus Systematic Bias—A Reply to “Copying the Wrong Winner? When Noisy Attribution Reverses Mutual Learning Prescriptions”
Jerker Denrell, Michael Christensen, Thorbjørn Knudsen, Chengwei Liu et al.
2026-08-13 · DOI: 10.5465/amr.2026.0577Beyond Configurational Primacy: A Commentary on Campbell and Fiss’s “Tackling the Complexity Challenge: When and How to Engage in Configurational and Hybrid Theorizing”
M. Madeleine Meurer, Joep P. Cornelissen, Ferran Torres
2026-08-10 · DOI: 10.5465/amr.2026.0371Toward an Architecture of Visioning: Insights From Gaudí’s Sagrada Familia
Yih-Teen Lee
2026-07-20 · DOI: 10.5465/amr.2025.0897The Generative AI Dilemma in Knowledge-Intensive Teams
Jessica A. Reif, Jonathon N. Cummings
2026-07-17 · DOI: 10.5465/amr.2024.0538Issues of Deception and Complicity: Replies to the Commentaries on “Management Theory: Jungle, Myth, or Hoax?”
Hugh Willmott
2026-07-13 · DOI: 10.5465/amr.2026.0298A Theory of the Temporal Embeddedness of Firms in Entrepreneurs’ Lives
Mateja Andric
2026-07-08 · DOI: 10.5465/amr.2025.0095A Stakeholder Governance Framework for Public–Private Partnerships
Africa Ariño, Pascual Berrone, Joan E. Ricart, Xavier Sobrepere et al.
2026-07-07 · DOI: 10.5465/amr.2024.0051From Theoretical Glitter to Gold: Using Foreign Theories in Management
Dana Minbaeva, Hossam Zeitoun
2026-07 · DOI: 10.5465/amr.2026.0729Why and How Societal Crises Give Rise to Extreme Growth Outliers: A Theory of External Enablement
Frederik von Briel, Per Davidsson, Jan Recker
2026-07 · DOI: 10.5465/amr.2023.0072External Enablement Is Non-Deterministic but the Occurrence of Extreme Growth Outliers Is Still Systematic: A Reply to “Outliers by Accident” and “Outliers in Waiting”
Frederik von Briel, Per Davidsson, Jan Recker
2026-07 · DOI: 10.5465/amr.2025.0497Outliers by Accident: Extending Von Briel et al.’s Theory of External Enablement through Stochastic Processes
Jun Xia, Yuehua Xu
2026-07 · DOI: 10.5465/amr.2025.0277Delineation of Reasoning, Intentional Disclosure, and the Potential for Harm: An Extension of Vanneste and Puranam’s “Artificial Intelligence, Trust, and Perceptions of Agency”
Jayson Killoran, Andrew Park, Jan Kietzmann
2026-07 · DOI: 10.5465/amr.2024.0193Is Time the Great Equalizer? How Interpersonal Time Request Processes Are Shaped by and Reproduce Disparities
Borbala Csillag, Elizabeth M. Campbell, Le Zhou
2026-07 · DOI: 10.5465/amr.2023.0242Reviews
Community Reviews
Version History
April 14, 2025 at 12:14 pm
March 24, 2025