Academic Journal
Q1Argumentation
About Argumentation
Argumentation is a scholarly journal published by Springer Netherlands. SCImago 2025 lists it in Q1, with an SJR of 0.618 and H-index of 42.
Coverage: 1987-2026. Research categories: Linguistics and Language (Q1); Philosophy (Q1).
Verified field sources
- Journal Impact Factor: 1.3 — Official source; checked 2026-10-03. Journal metric year and editorial leadership as listed on the Springer Nature journal homepage.
- Impact Factor year: 2024 — Official source; checked 2026-10-03. Journal metric year and editorial leadership as listed on the Springer Nature journal homepage.
- Editor(s): Frans H. van Eemeren PhD; Peng Wu PhD (Editors-in-Chief) — Official source; checked 2026-10-03. Journal metric year and editorial leadership as listed on the Springer Nature journal homepage.
Source-backed journal facts
Topics in published research
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation; Language, Metaphor, and Cognition; Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics; Discourse Analysis in Language Studies; Rhetoric and Communication Studies; Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies.
OpenAlex classifies topics from published works. These topics are not the publisher’s official aims and scope.
Reported open-access list prices
3,090.00 USD; 2,490.00 EUR; 2,190.00 GBP
APC list prices reported by OpenAlex, which obtains this information from DOAJ. Confirm current charges, taxes, waivers and eligibility with the publisher; this is not a fee quotation.
Source: OpenAlex source record. Retrieved 2026-10-03. Source record updated 2026-10-02. OpenAlex metrics are different from SCImago metrics and the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.
Journal Metrics
Quartile, SJR and the listed SCImago H-index use the 2025 imported SCImago dataset. A quartile may vary by subject category. Values without a source or reporting year are unverified historical entries. Verify the current Journal Impact Factor with Clarivate or the publisher before using it.
Aims & Scope
The publisher’s official aims and scope have not yet been verified for this profile. Use the journal website to check subject fit and accepted article types before submitting.
Recent Research Articles
Latest publications matched automatically by ISSN.
The Implicit Audience Problem in Computational Argument Quality Assessment: A Pragmatic Critique and the ASAQ Framework
Jassim khairy Haidar
2026-09-23 · DOI: 10.1007/s10503-026-09734-yAdversarial Alignment in Argumentation
José Luis Liñán
2026-09-17 · DOI: 10.1007/s10503-026-09732-0Arguer’s Identity and Authorization for Phatic and Emotive Moves: A Proposal for an Extension to Inference Anchoring Theory
Barbara Konat, Angelo Delliponti, Eliza Wessel, Monika Obrębska et al.
2026-09-16 · DOI: 10.1007/s10503-026-09731-1Benefits, Diversity, and Prospects of Experimental Methods in Argumentation
Jennifer Schumann, Steve Oswald
2026-09-12 · DOI: 10.1007/s10503-026-09733-zPrototypical Argumentative Patterns in Chinese Diplomatic Statements at United Nations Security Council Meetings on the Ukraine Crisis
Peng Wu, Pinchao Lu
2026-09-11 · DOI: 10.1007/s10503-026-09725-zJames B. Freeman: Adequate Connections: Assessing Argument Ground Adequacy: Argumentation Library 38: Cham, Switzerland, Springer 2025, xiii + 179 pp., 11 b/w figures
David Hitchcock
2026-09-03 · DOI: 10.1007/s10503-026-09730-2Biased Reasoning, Argument Analysis, and the Principle of Charity
Nastasia Mueller, David Löwenstein, Gottfried Vosgerau
2026-09-03 · DOI: 10.1007/s10503-026-09728-wArgumentation Flaws in Institutional Handling of an Allegation of Research Misconduct
Sylvain Tollis, Marie Maze, Erja Moore
2026-08-28 · DOI: 10.1007/s10503-026-09723-1The Discourse-Directive Function of Loci in the Argument Model of Topics
Dorottya Egres
2026-08-28 · DOI: 10.1007/s10503-026-09727-xCorrection: Orientations toward Interpersonal Arguing in Ukraine, Across Three War Conditions
Iryna Khomenko, Dale Hample
2026-08-28 · DOI: 10.1007/s10503-026-09729-9AI-Authorship Accusations Against Human Discussants: A Pragma-Dialectical Account of Procedural Derailment
Oskar Pogorzelski
2026-08-27 · DOI: 10.1007/s10503-026-09726-yThe Civic Argument Literacy Test (CALT) – Foundations and Development
Mika Hietanen, Annika M. Svedholm-Häkkinen
2026-08-24 · DOI: 10.1007/s10503-026-09717-zThe Identity Function of Argumentation in Religious Discourse: A Comparative Case Study
Agnieszka Bryła-Cruz, Martin Hinton, Weronika Olkowska, Miriam Kobierski et al.
2026-08-24 · DOI: 10.1007/s10503-026-09719-xArgumentation Absent Understanding: Minimal Threshold Conditions for Epistemically Adequate Uptake
Yongho Choi
2026-08-20 · DOI: 10.1007/s10503-026-09722-2Invitational Rhetoric and Persuasion Rhetoric: Aligning Argumentative Influence with Epistemic Agency
Matthew McKeon
2026-08-11 · DOI: 10.1007/s10503-026-09724-0From Visual Structure to Argument Reconstruction: Inferential Pressure in Théodore Géricault’s Le Radeau de la Méduse
Deniz Çelik
2026-07-20 · DOI: 10.1007/s10503-026-09721-3Orientations toward Interpersonal Arguing in Ukraine, Across Three War Conditions
Iryna Khomenko, Dale Hample
2026-07-09 · DOI: 10.1007/s10503-026-09712-4Review of the Volume: Ana María Mora Márquez and Gustavo Fernández Walker (Eds.) (2025), Revisiting Medieval Dialectics, Springer, Argumentation Library, 255 pp
Sara Greco
2026-07-09 · DOI: 10.1007/s10503-026-09716-0From Reasonableness to Responsiveness: A Pragmatic-Cognitive Device for Argumentation in Mediation
Victorina Bastante Soler
2026-07-09 · DOI: 10.1007/s10503-026-09715-1Arguments and Proto-arguments in Multimodal Protest
Lotte van Poppel, Jan Albert van Laar
2026-07-03 · DOI: 10.1007/s10503-026-09718-yReviews
Community Reviews
Version History
October 2, 2026 at 9:13 pm
October 2, 2026