Academic Journal
Q1Artificial Intelligence and Law
About Artificial Intelligence and Law
About Artificial Intelligence and Law
Artificial Intelligence and Law is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal published by 29 (Netherlands). It focuses on Q1. Publication coverage spans 1992-1993, 1995-2026.
Key indicators: ISSN 0924-8463, 1572-8382; H-index 54; Impact Factor 5.3.
Understanding This Journal's Metrics
Journal metrics help researchers assess fit, but they must be interpreted in context:
- H-index (54): Strong citation impact — 54 articles cited at least 54 times each, reflecting solid influence.
- Impact Factor (5.3): Average citations per recent article. A solid figure indicating regular citation by the research community.
Publishing in Artificial Intelligence and Law
This is a well-regarded journal with a solid reputation. Manuscripts should present clear advances and be methodologically rigorous. Competition is significant but the venue is accessible to strong research.
- Scope fit: Confirm your research aligns with Q1. Off-scope manuscripts are typically desk-rejected quickly.
- Author guidelines: Follow formatting, reference style, and article-type requirements exactly — non-compliant manuscripts may be returned without review.
- Submission: Submit via the official journal website.
Is This Journal Right for Your Paper?
- Audience match: Will the journal's readers cite and build on your findings?
- Timeline: Higher-tier journals mean longer review and higher rejection risk. Balance prestige against your schedule.
- Indexing: Confirm indexing in Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed (if biomedical) meets your institutional requirements.
- Open access needs: Check funder mandates and whether the journal offers compliant OA options.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the ISSN of Artificial Intelligence and Law?
0924-8463, 1572-8382.
Who publishes Artificial Intelligence and Law?
29.
What are Artificial Intelligence and Law's metrics?
Impact Factor 5.3; H-index 54.
Where do I submit to Artificial Intelligence and Law?
Via the official website.
Is Artificial Intelligence and Law peer-reviewed?
Yes — it is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal indexed in major academic databases.
Verified field sources
- Journal Impact Factor: 5.3 — Official source; checked 2026-10-03. Journal metric year and editorial leadership as listed on the Springer Nature journal homepage.
- Impact Factor year: 2025 — Official source; checked 2026-10-03. Journal metric year and editorial leadership as listed on the Springer Nature journal homepage.
Source-backed journal facts
Topics in published research
Artificial Intelligence in Law; Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation; Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge; Topic Modeling; Natural Language Processing Techniques; Semantic Web and Ontologies.
OpenAlex classifies topics from published works. These topics are not the publisher’s official aims and scope.
Reported open-access list prices
3,190.00 USD; 2,590.00 EUR; 2,290.00 GBP
APC list prices reported by OpenAlex, which obtains this information from DOAJ. Confirm current charges, taxes, waivers and eligibility with the publisher; this is not a fee quotation.
Source: OpenAlex source record. Retrieved 2026-10-03. Source record updated 2026-10-02. OpenAlex metrics are different from SCImago metrics and the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.
Journal Metrics
Quartile, SJR and the listed SCImago H-index use the 2025 imported SCImago dataset. A quartile may vary by subject category. Values without a source or reporting year are unverified historical entries. Verify the current Journal Impact Factor with Clarivate or the publisher before using it.
Aims & Scope
The publisher’s official aims and scope have not yet been verified for this profile. Use the journal website to check subject fit and accepted article types before submitting.
Recent Research Articles
Latest publications matched automatically by ISSN.
Generative Discourse Parsing for Indian Law
Chaitra C R, Namit Bhutani, Sankalp Kulkarni, Sai Rama Akash Varma Sagi et al.
2026-10-01 · DOI: 10.1007/s10506-026-09544-3IslamicLegalBench: Evaluating LLMs knowledge and reasoning of islamic law across 1,200 years of Islamic pluralist legal traditions
Ezieddin Elmahjub, Junaid Qadir, Abdullah Mushtaq, Rafay Naeem et al.
2026-09-17 · DOI: 10.1007/s10506-026-09535-4Legal case representation for multi-tasks based on intermediate hidden layers
Eya Hammami, Rim Faiz
2026-09-04 · DOI: 10.1007/s10506-026-09533-6A modular transformer-based pipeline for named entity recognition, coreference resolution, and sentiment analysis in legal judgment documents
Varsha Naik, Rajeswari K
2026-08-31 · DOI: 10.1007/s10506-026-09539-0AILQA: Evaluating AI-driven legal question answering systems for the indian legal system
Shubham Kumar Nigam, Shubham Kumar Mishra, Noel Shallum, Kripabandhu Ghosh et al.
2026-08-24 · DOI: 10.1007/s10506-026-09537-2Automated transformation of financial regulations into SBVR: an ontology-based and natural language processing approach
Anderson Santos, Paulo Sérgio Muniz Silva
2026-08-18 · DOI: 10.1007/s10506-026-09532-7Accountability shift in human–AI collaborations
Qingye Jiang
2026-08-17 · DOI: 10.1007/s10506-026-09536-3Human realignment
Christoph Engel, Yoan Hermstrüwer, Alison Kim
2026-08-17 · DOI: 10.1007/s10506-026-09517-6The role of diversity in few-shot learning for multi-label classification of legal documents
Subinay Adhikary, Debasis Ganguly, Dwaipayan Roy, Shouvik Kumar Guha et al.
2026-08-13 · DOI: 10.1007/s10506-026-09530-9Explainable Statute Prediction via Attention-based Model and LLM Prompting
Sachin Pawar, Girish K. Palshikar, Anindita Sinha Banerjee, Nitin Ramrakhiyani et al.
2026-08-10 · DOI: 10.1007/s10506-026-09534-5Intelligent support for soil and water conservation compliance: decision assistance capabilities of prompt-enhanced large language models
Yichao Zhang, Junqi Zhao, Mengchen Ju, Qiye Ye et al.
2026-08-04 · DOI: 10.1007/s10506-026-09531-8LLM as a law professor: having a large language model write a commentary on freedom of assembly
Christoph Engel, Johannes Kruse
2026-07-22 · DOI: 10.1007/s10506-026-09527-4Logic-based interpretability and analysis of neural legal AI models
Yiping Tang, Rui Shao, Lingyan Yang, Yifei Qiao et al.
2026-07-21 · DOI: 10.1007/s10506-026-09528-3LLM-assisted formalization for deterministic detection of statutory inconsistency in tax law
Borchuluun Yadamsuren, Steven Keith Platt, Miguel Diaz
2026-07-10 · DOI: 10.1007/s10506-026-09525-6Mining legal arguments to study judicial formalism
Tomáš Koref, Lena Held, Mahammad Namazov, Yassine Thlija et al.
2026-07-07 · DOI: 10.1007/s10506-026-09524-7Beyond multi–agent translation: engineering fidelity in legislative text translation via hierarchical control
Lingyi Meng, Ziyang Lian, Hao Wang, Qi Yang et al.
2026-07-02 · DOI: 10.1007/s10506-026-09529-2Tracking the evolution of case law with main path analysis
Xiaorui Jiang, Maria Breskaya, Gijs van Dijck
2026-07-01 · DOI: 10.1007/s10506-026-09523-8Automatic extraction and collection of legal principles from CJEU decisions on Fiscal State Aid
Sezen Perçin, Rūta Liepiņa, Andrea Galassi, Francesca Lagioia et al.
2026-06-22 · DOI: 10.1007/s10506-026-09526-5CourtSim-LLM: fine-tuning large language models with multi-turn dialogues for chinese mock trials
Zhongyuan Xu, Yue Guo, Kexin Zhou, Zhuhui Guo et al.
2026-06-04 · DOI: 10.1007/s10506-026-09511-yScenario-based Bayesian networks for legal evidence
Christian Dahlman, Hylke Jellema
2026-05-23 · DOI: 10.1007/s10506-026-09522-9Reviews
Community Reviews
Version History
October 9, 2026 at 9:41 pm
October 2, 2026