Academic Journal
Quartile not availableBibliothek
About Bibliothek
Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis — Full Journal Profile
The journal listed in many directories under the short title Bibliothek is, in full, Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis — in English, Library: Research and Practice — the long-running German journal of librarianship published by De Gruyter in Berlin. Its print ISSN is 0341-4183 and its online ISSN is 1865-7648. Founded in 1977, it publishes three issues a year and is described by its publisher as the only journal covering all aspects of librarianship in Germany, carrying essays and reports on recent developments and trends in academic and public libraries all over the world. Since 1 January 2021 the journal has been published in gold open access through the Subscribe to Open model, under a Creative Commons CC BY licence, with authors retaining copyright and — a point of real significance in a humanities and social-science field — without author-facing article processing charges while the model holds. Its articles carry DOIs in the 10.1515/bfp series, and article abstracts are provided in both German and English.
The shortened title matters practically. A citation, subscription record or directory entry that says only Bibliothek can be mistaken for a generic word — the German word for library — or confused with other library publications. The full title, the abbreviation BFP, the De Gruyter platform, and the two ISSNs together identify this journal unambiguously. This profile therefore uses the full title throughout, flags the directory's short-title form for correction review, and grounds every factual claim in the publisher's journal pages, the publisher's Subscribe to Open announcement, or established bibliographic listings. Where a metric could not be verified from a primary service during preparation, this profile says so instead of repeating figures from secondary listing sites.
Identity at a Glance
Full title: Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis. Short title in the JournalsWorld record: Bibliothek. Abbreviation: BFP. Publisher: Walter de Gruyter GmbH (De Gruyter), Berlin, Germany. Print ISSN: 0341-4183. Online ISSN: 1865-7648. Founded: 1977. Frequency: Triannual — three issues per year. Languages: Primarily German, with summaries in German and English; the journal is catalogued as multi-language. Field: Library and information science, covering academic libraries, public libraries, and related information practice. Access model since 2021: Gold open access via Subscribe to Open, CC BY, authors retain copyright, no author APCs under the model. DOI prefix pattern: 10.1515/bfp, De Gruyter's prefix with the journal code bfp. Editorial character, in the publisher's description: Editors who are proven authorities in the field, holding leadership positions in libraries and archives or teaching posts at universities.
The journal's longevity is itself a key fact. A title founded in 1977 has published through the card-catalogue era, the automation era, the web era, the discovery-system era, the open-access transition and the current period of research-data services, digital collections and artificial-intelligence debate in libraries. Its archive on the De Gruyter platform reaches back across those decades, which makes it a primary source not only for current practice but for the history of German librarianship — a dual role that few newer titles can claim, and one that shapes both its contents and its readership.
Publisher, Setting and the German Library Landscape
De Gruyter, headquartered in Berlin, is one of Germany's major academic publishers, with a list spanning the humanities, social sciences, law, medicine and the natural sciences, and a journal platform that hosts Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis alongside information-science neighbours such as Information – Wissenschaft und Praxis. The publisher's Berlin address, Genthiner Strasse 13, appears in bibliographic listings for the journal. For BFP, the De Gruyter platform provides the issue archive, article PDFs and HTML, DOI registration, and the Subscribe to Open presentation that explains the journal's funding model to subscribing libraries.
The journal's setting is the German library system, one of the world's most institutionally diverse: national and state libraries, university libraries, public library systems run by cities and municipalities, special and research libraries, archives-adjacent services, and a strong professional-association culture. BFP's remit, as the publisher frames it, is to cover all aspects of librarianship in Germany while also reporting developments in academic and public libraries internationally. That combination — a national professional-scholarly conversation open to worldwide comparison — explains the journal's contents mix: German practice reports and policy discussion appear alongside reports from other countries, conference reporting, and research with direct implications for services. Readers outside Germany who work on library strategy, user experience, open access in libraries, research infrastructures or digital services will find the journal valuable precisely because the German system often confronts shared problems — funding pressure, digital transformation, changing user expectations — at large scale and with detailed published reflection.
A 2024 editorial marking the political turning point of 1989 and its aftermath, co-authored by senior figures including Ann Matheson, Elmar Mittler and Konrad Umlauf, illustrates this reflective dimension: the journal treats the reunification-era transformation of East and West German libraries — new access to collections, new cooperation possibilities, acute financial pressure and large institutional adjustment — as part of the profession's living memory. A practice journal that also curates professional memory gives its readers continuity that a purely technical outlet cannot.
Aims, Scope and the Structure of an Issue
The publisher summarises the scope compactly: all aspects of librarianship are discussed. The issue structure shows what that means in practice. Each issue contains sections for general essays on libraries, research and conference reports, practical advice and tips, reviews, further literature, announcements of events, and advice on products. Articles are provided with summaries in German and English, which makes the research discoverable to non-German readers even when the full text is in German. A typical issue therefore works on three levels at once: scholarship (essays and research reports that advance understanding), professional intelligence (conference reports, event announcements, literature and product guidance), and craft knowledge (practical advice that a working librarian can apply immediately).
Recent contents confirm the breadth. Articles visible in the journal's current listing include a report on a queer collections project at Cologne's public library, presenting insights from an ongoing project at the Stadtbibliothek Köln; a multi-author study of user experience and service design in libraries; a reflection on European research infrastructures in the humanities and the experience of navigating them; a study measuring the impact of libraries on their users, in which three libraries in the canton of Zurich adapted a Danish model impact study and considered how the results can be used internally and externally to develop services and public perception; and a history of the Open Library Badge, tracing its development over ten years from a grassroots initiative into an institutionalised working group within the German Library Association, including the renewed 2025 edition of the badge. Add to those the journal's substantial review section — a single recent review, for example, assesses a 568-page De Gruyter volume on knowledge, reading and culture in information practice — and the picture is of a journal where service innovation, openness, user research and scholarly book culture are all core business.
For prospective authors, the scope test is professional relevance plus evidence. A manuscript should either advance research on libraries, report a well-documented development or project in a way others can learn from, or synthesise a trend affecting academic or public libraries. Purely local news without transferable lessons belongs in the announcements and reports sections rather than the essay section, and authors should target the right section deliberately. Because summaries appear in both German and English, authors should craft the English summary with the same care as the German one: for many international readers, that summary is the article.
History: From 1977 to Subscribe to Open
Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis has been published since 1977, appearing three times a year. Its title joins the two halves of its mission — Forschung, research, and Praxis, practice — and that pairing has remained its organising idea across nearly five decades. The journal's commitment, in the publisher's words, to free access to information and knowledge dates from its founding, and that commitment is the thread that leads directly to its most important recent development: its conversion to open access.
On 16 September 2020 De Gruyter announced, together with the journal's editors and the National Contact Point Open Access OA2020-DE, that BFP would be transformed into open access through the Subscribe to Open model, with all content in gold open access on the De Gruyter platform from 1 January 2021, provided the model held. Subscribe to Open works differently from the article-charge model common in the sciences. Institutions that subscribe continue to subscribe as usual. As long as subscriptions are maintained at the required level, the year's content is published under a Creative Commons licence and made freely available to everyone. If subscriptions fall below the minimum threshold, the paywall is reactivated and access returns to subscribers only. Authors pay no article processing charges under this arrangement, because the costs are covered collectively by subscribing libraries — a fitting arrangement, in the publisher's framing, for a journal of librarianship, and one the publisher presented as a pilot that could offer a sustainable transformation route for other humanities and social-science journals. De Gruyter's managing director at the time, Carsten Buhr, emphasised the importance of testing alternatives to publish-and-read agreements in fields where charge-based publishing is less established, and noted the publisher's participation in the Subscribe to Open Community of Practice so the experience could be shared.
The journal's own platform notice confirms the operating terms: transformed to open access (CC BY, authors retain copyright) without author APCs via the Subscribe to Open model. Authors should understand the conditional nature of the model — openness is renewed year by year through library support — and libraries should understand their role in it: cancelling a subscription is not merely a local saving, because the model's threshold logic makes each continuing subscription part of what keeps the journal open for all readers and free for all authors.
Editorial Leadership
The publisher characterises the editors as proven authorities in the field who occupy leadership positions in libraries and archives or teaching posts at universities. That description is borne out by the names attached to the journal's editorial work. A 2024 editorial on the post-1989 transformation of libraries was authored by Ann Matheson, Elmar Mittler and Konrad Umlauf — figures associated with senior library leadership and library scholarship in Germany and beyond. The editorial model is practitioner-scholar led rather than publisher-staff led: the people shaping the journal run libraries, teach librarianship, and participate in the professional debates the journal publishes.
For authors, the practical implications are threefold. First, submissions are judged by readers who know operational reality; claims about services, systems or user behaviour should be evidenced, not asserted. Second, the journal values the report genre — a rigorous account of a project, a service change or a collaboration, with honest reflection on what worked — as highly as the conventional research article. Third, because the board's expertise spans academic and public libraries, manuscripts should state clearly which library sector their findings address and how far they transfer. The current full editorial board should be confirmed on the De Gruyter journal page, which is the authoritative and most frequently updated source; this profile intentionally avoids freezing a full board list that the publisher may revise between issues.
Access, Licensing and Costs for Authors
Under Subscribe to Open, current content is gold open access on the De Gruyter platform under CC BY, and authors retain copyright. CC BY is the most permissive standard Creative Commons licence: readers may copy, distribute and adapt the work, including commercially, with appropriate credit. For authors, retaining copyright and publishing under CC BY maximises reuse of their own work — in teaching, in institutional repositories, and in later publications — without seeking publisher permission. For the journal, the model removes the author-side paywall that charge-based open access creates, which matters in a profession where many potential authors are practitioners without grant funding for publication fees.
Two cautions belong in any honest account. First, the model's continuation depends on subscriptions holding at the required level each year, as the publisher's announcement explains; authors submitting now should check the journal page for the current year's open-access status. Second, older content and the exact licence terms applicable to a specific article should be checked on the article page itself, since terms can vary by year and article type. Subject to those checks, the author-facing position is unusually favourable: a nearly fifty-year-old, professionally central journal, openly readable worldwide, with no article charge — sustained by libraries for libraries.
Indexing, Metrics and Verification
Bibliographic identity for this journal is firmly documented: print ISSN 0341-4183 and online ISSN 1865-7648 appear consistently across the publisher's platform, library catalogues and journal listings, and the journal is catalogued in library and information science as a triannual, multi-language title published by Walter de Gruyter in Berlin. Secondary listings report that the journal is indexed in Web of Science services; authors who need a specific index — for example the Emerging Sources Citation Index or a particular Scopus category — for institutional reporting should verify the current coverage directly in that service, because this profile did not verify a current quartile, SJR value, CiteScore or impact factor from Clarivate, Elsevier or SCImago during preparation, and the JournalsWorld structured record likewise carries no verified quartile or metric for the title. German-language professional journals are frequently under-represented in citation metrics relative to their professional importance, so a metric absence should not be read as a quality signal in either direction.
Verification steps are simple. On the De Gruyter platform, search the full title Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis and confirm the ISSNs and the Subscribe to Open notice. In a library catalogue, search either ISSN; both should resolve to the same title and publisher. In citing the journal, give the full title or the standard BFP abbreviation, the year, volume and issue, and the article DOI in the 10.1515/bfp series where one is assigned. If a third-party site gives different ISSNs, a different publisher, or an article charge for this journal, treat the De Gruyter journal page as authoritative — and note that a claimed author charge contradicts the publisher's stated Subscribe to Open terms.
Who Should Read and Publish Here
Readers: library directors and strategy staff tracking service innovation and openness; academic librarians working on user experience, service design, research infrastructures and scholarly communication; public librarians developing community, diversity and impact-measurement work; library and information science researchers and students, for whom the journal is a core German-language source; and anyone studying how a national library profession documents its own transformation over five decades. The bilingual summaries make the journal usable in international literature reviews even for readers who will read only selected full texts in German.
Authors: researchers with library-focused studies, project teams with well-evaluated service innovations to report, and reviewers and essayists who can place a development in professional context. Manuscripts are typically in German, should be written for a knowledgeable professional readership, and should include German and English summaries. Before submitting, read a recent issue end to end — including its reviews and reports sections — to choose the right section, match the journal's tone of evidenced practice, and frame your contribution's transferability beyond a single institution. Then follow the author instructions on the De Gruyter journal page for formatting, submission route and any current calls.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the journal's full title? Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis. The single word Bibliothek in some directory records is a shortened form of the same title, not a different journal. Who publishes it? De Gruyter (Walter de Gruyter GmbH), Berlin. What are its ISSNs? 0341-4183 in print and 1865-7648 online. How often does it appear? Three times a year, since 1977. Is it open access? Yes — since 1 January 2021 under the Subscribe to Open model, published CC BY with authors retaining copyright, as long as the model's subscription threshold is met. Do authors pay a charge? Under the Subscribe to Open terms announced by the publisher, no author article processing charges apply; libraries' subscriptions sustain the model. What does it publish? Essays and research on all aspects of librarianship, research and conference reports, practical advice, reviews, literature guidance and professional announcements, covering academic and public libraries in Germany and internationally. Where is it published online? On the De Gruyter platform, with article DOIs in the 10.1515/bfp series.
Profile prepared for JournalsWorld from De Gruyter's journal pages and Subscribe to Open announcement, and established bibliographic listings. Facts were verified in October 2026. Board membership, calls and the annual Subscribe to Open status change; confirm them on the publisher's journal page before acting.
Journal Metrics
A quartile may vary by subject category. Values without a source or reporting year are unverified historical entries. Verify the current Journal Impact Factor with Clarivate or the publisher before using it.
Aims & Scope
The publisher’s official aims and scope have not yet been verified for this profile. Use the journal website to check subject fit and accepted article types before submitting.
Recent Research Articles
Latest publications matched automatically by ISSN.
First-Generation-Studierende als Bibliotheksnutzende – Diversität, Klasse und Bildungsgerechtigkeit in wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken
Lorenz Weinberg
2026-10-22 · DOI: 10.1515/bfp-2026-0036Queerness in der bibliothekswissenschaftlichen Lehre
Claudia Frick, Luisa Blumenthal, Henriette Dymke
2026-10-22 · DOI: 10.1515/bfp-2026-0026Klaus G. Saur – Das Lebenswerk
Klaus-Dieter Lehmann
2026-10-22 · DOI: 10.1515/bfp-2026-0046„QueerBib – so queer wie ihr“: Einblicke in das laufende Projekt der Stadtbibliothek Köln
Yvonne Fischer
2026-10-10 · DOI: 10.1515/bfp-2026-0029User Experience und Service Design in Bibliotheken
Alena Behrens, Nicole Clasen, Sina Menzel, Cornelia Vonhof et al.
2026-10-09 · DOI: 10.1515/bfp-2026-0028Matthew Kelly (Ed.): Knowledge, Reading and Culture: Studies in Information Practice. (Current Topics in Library and Information Practice). Berlin: De Gruyter, 2026. 568 pp., 18 Figs., 1 Table, ISBN 978-3-11-134630-4 (Hardcover), https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111346519, 129,95 €
Michael Seadle
2026-09-08 · DOI: 10.1515/bfp-2026-0023Lost in Research Infrastructures – Reflections on European Research Infrastructures in the Humanities
Nanette Rißler-Pipka, Daniel Kurzawe
2026-09-08 · DOI: 10.1515/bfp-2026-0030Alain Roy, Lucie Hotte, Hélène Carrier und Linda Savoie (éd.): Bibliothèques et archives dans les communautés de langue officielle en situation minoritaire. Enjeux et devenir. (Études canadiennes). Ottawa: Les Presses de l’Université d’Ottawa, 2025. 232 S., ISBN 9782760342187 (Hardcover), ISBN 9782760342200 (EPUB). 71,95 CAD (geb.) bzw. 31,99 CAD (EPUB)
Hans-Christoph Hobohm
2026-09-08 · DOI: 10.1515/bfp-2026-0027Michael Knoche : Revolution im Leseland. Wie sich die wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken der DDR nach dem Mauerfall neu organisierten. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag 2026. 200 S., 28 Abb., geb., Schutzumschlag. ISBN 978-3-8353-6073-0. 24,00 €
Ekkehard Henschke
2026-09-08 · DOI: 10.1515/bfp-2026-0033Titelseiten
2026-08-05 · DOI: 10.1515/bfp-2026-frontmatter2Ethische Betrachtungen der automatisierten Textanalyse : Fortschritte, Risiken und die Notwendigkeit eines Gleichgewichts
David Scheffer, Mohammad Zahurul Islam
2026-08-05 · DOI: 10.1515/bfp-2026-0017Petra Hauke, Antonia Mocatta, Priscilla Nga Ian Pun (Eds.): Libraries Driving Education for Sustainable Development. [ Bibliotheken als Motor für Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung ]. IFLA Publications 186. Berlin: De Gruyter Saur 2025. 452 S., e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-133646-6, Open Access
Janet Wagner
2026-08-05 · DOI: 10.1515/bfp-2025-0046Künstliche Intelligenz (KI) und Robotik
Frank Seeliger, Janett Mohnke
2026-08-05 · DOI: 10.1515/bfp-2026-0021KI bei Studierenden: Empirische Erhebung zu Nutzungspraxis, Erwartungen und Haltungen
Erik Senst, Dana-Kristin Mah
2026-08-05 · DOI: 10.1515/bfp-2026-0018DIY RAG-Anwendung: Überlegungen für einen erfolgreichen Start
Andrea Brandstätter
2026-08-05 · DOI: 10.1515/bfp-2026-0020From Project Cycles to Collective Governance: Sustaining Digital Research Infrastructures through the GKFI
Stefan Buddenbohm, Aline Deicke, Daniel Kurzawe, Andrea Rapp et al.
2026-08-05 · DOI: 10.1515/bfp-2026-0012Pepper-Roboter in Bibliotheken: Teamplayer oder Spielerei?
Leon Eppinger, Lisann Kanzler, Pia Reinhold, Sophie Tertel et al.
2026-08-05 · DOI: 10.1515/bfp-2026-0010Educational Robots in Public Libraries : An Innovative Approach to Early Reading Literacy Development
Oskar Lorenz, Janett Mohnke
2026-08-05 · DOI: 10.1515/bfp-2026-0005WOER suchet, der findet nicht! Identifikation von thematisch verwandten OER-Materialien
Sebastian Zug, André Dietrich, Oliver Löwe, Veit Köppen et al.
2026-08-05 · DOI: 10.1515/bfp-2026-0001ALIMA – Ein RAG-basiertes System zur LLM-gestützten Sacherschließung: Prototypentwicklung und erste Erfahrungen aus der Praxis
Conrad Hübler
2026-08-05 · DOI: 10.1515/bfp-2026-0014Reviews
Community Reviews
Version History
October 14, 2026 at 11:42 pm
October 14, 2026