Academic Journal
Q1Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review
About Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review
Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review is a scholarly journal published by Harvard Kennedy School. SCImago 2025 lists it in Q1, with an SJR of 1.362 and H-index of 37.
Coverage: 2020-2026. Research categories: Social Sciences (miscellaneous) (Q1).
Journal Metrics
Metrics can change by reporting year. Verify time-sensitive values with the publisher or indexing service.
Aims & Scope
Scope information will be added after verification.
Recent Research Articles
Latest publications matched automatically by ISSN.
From avoider to challenger: How individuals respond when faced with misinformation
Lauren Scott, Marta E. Cecchinato, Mark Warner
2026-08-31 · DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-211Monitoring misinformation, building discernment: A crowdsourcing study during the 2025 Australian federal election
Ariel Kruger, Piers Howe, Morgan Saletta
2026-08-27 · DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-210Alternative science against the corrupt elites? The effects of pseudoscience and censorship accusations in health misinformation
Ozan Kuru, Siyu Siyu Zhang
2026-08-20 · DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-209Turning OSINV inside the machine: Open-source investigations and information disorder
Philip Di Salvo
2026-08-12 · DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-208Professional and community-based fact-checking show different strengths, but neither performs strongly across trust, scalability, and impact
Petter Bae Brandtzaeg, Silje Susanne Silje Susanne Alvestad, Jonas R. Jonas R. Kunst, Asbjørn Asbjørn Følstad et al.
2026-07-30 · DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-206Experts disagree on how to fight AI disinformation, but agree that health and politics need different solutions
Alexander Loth, Martin Kappes, Marc-Oliver Pahl
2026-07-29 · DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-205“When politicians make claims, we are journalists”: Political fact-checking and social media partnerships
Nathalia Gonzalez Gonzalez, Juliana da Cunha Mota, Nicole Stremlau
2026-07-28 · DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-207Amplifying the storm: Climate disinformation dynamics during natural disasters on right-wing extremist Telegram channels
Diego DiMattina, André Sobral, David Nemer
2026-07-23 · DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-204Narrative monitoring and argument-checking: Enhancing effectiveness in countering disinformation beyond fact-checking
Celia Ramos, Clara Jiménez-Cruz, Pablo Hernández-Escayola
2026-07-07 · DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-198Accountability in name only: Fact-checking under the EU’s Code of Practice on Disinformation
Madalina Botan Botan
2026-07-07 · DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-203Fact-checking what matters: How a harms-based model for selecting claims works
Peter Cunliffe-Jones
2026-07-07 · DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-197Beyond compliance: How European fact checkers correct their own errors
Mato Brautović, Ivana Grkeš Tošović, Romana John
2026-07-07 · DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-199Fact-checking at a crossroads: Fact checkers’ perspectives on Community Notes, AI integration, and design recommendations
Basak Bozkurt, Mohsen Mosleh, Helen Margetts
2026-07-07 · DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-202Fact-checking in the multipolar AI order: Between epistemic sovereignty and ambivalence
Gregory Gregory Asmolov
2026-07-07 · DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-201Quantifying the “misinformation beat”: 38 years of coverage in major U.S. daily newspapers
Bryce Greene, Brian P. Harper, Christena E. Nippert-Eng
2026-06-23 · DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-200On the same page? Experts are mostly, but not always aligned about disinformation in times of generative AI
Teresa Weikmann, Ferre Wouters, Marina Tulin, Michael Hameleers et al.
2026-03-03 · DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-196People rely on their existing political beliefs to identify election misinformation
Sora Park, Jee Young Lee, Kieran McGuinness, Caroline Fisher et al.
2026-02-19 · DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-195Emotional resonance and participatory misinformation: Learning from a K-pop controversy
Sungha Kang, Rachel E. Moran, Jin Ha Lee
2026-02-05 · DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-194Prebunking misinformation techniques in social media feeds: Results from an Instagram field study
Sander van der Linden, Debra Louison-Lavoy, Nicholas Blazer, Nancy S. Noble et al.
2026-01-22 · DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-193Reviews
Community Reviews
Version History
September 25, 2026 at 7:32 am
September 25, 2026