Academic Journal
Q1International Affairs
About International Affairs
International Affairs is a scholarly journal published by Wiley-Blackwell. SCImago 2025 places it in Q1 with an SJR of 2.097 and an H-index of 113.
Its listed coverage is 1979-1986, 1988-1989, 1996-2026 and its research categories include Political Science and International Relations (Q1); Sociology and Political Science (Q1). The 2025 dataset reports 104 documents and 1822 citations across the latest three-year reporting window.
Journal Metrics
Metrics can change by reporting year. Verify time-sensitive values with the publisher or indexing service.
Aims & Scope
The journal publishes research related to Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics, International Relations and Foreign Policy, Global Peace and Security Dynamics, European history and politics, Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics, International Development and Aid.
Recent Research Articles
Latest publications matched automatically by ISSN.
Justifying drones in the Sahel: international law, just securitization theory or jus ad vim ?
Daniel R Brunstetter
2026-09-09 · DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiag060Judging where states will not: towards a theory of relational legitimacy for people's tribunals
Aldo Zammit Borda
2026-09-09 · DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiag089Books reviewed: September 2026
2026-09-09 · DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiag156When rebels win: ideology, statebuilding, and power after civil wars
Carrie Manning
2026-09-09 · DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiag152On digital non-alignment
Scott L Malcomson
2026-09-09 · DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiag084(Autonomous) weapon transfers as maximal jus ad vim ? Lessons from Ukraine
Nathan G Wood
2026-09-09 · DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiag126Coercing Syria on chemical weapons: a case study of deterrence and coercive diplomacy
Soumyadeep Bidyanta
2026-09-09 · DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiag134Forecasting-informed foreign policy decision-making: the case of jus ad vim
Eamon Aloyo
2026-09-09 · DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiag053Jus ad vim spatialis : a normative assessment of force, limited force and other hostile acts in space
Louisa Handel-Mazzetti, Lonneke Peperkamp
2026-09-09 · DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiag127Responding to unjust vis : confronting unjust proxy warfare
James Pattison
2026-09-09 · DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiag122Dream road to Pan America: a century in pursuit of the world's longest highway
Philip Chrimes
2026-09-09 · DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiag151Abstracts
2026-09-09 · DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiag144What do scientists think? Receptivity of gender expertise according to the WHO's IHR Emergency Committees
Mariel Verroya, Sara E Davies, Jessica Kirk
2026-09-09 · DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiag058Contributors
2026-09-09 · DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiag143Deep contestations of the liberal international order
Lucrecia García Iommi
2026-09-09 · DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiag135Direct funding of indigenous organizations: why the present model of funding must be replaced
Patrick Cunningham
2026-09-09 · DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiag124The international politics of sex: bodies, images, and Russian state homophobia
Sophie Harman
2026-09-09 · DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiag141Balancing alone or together? How strategic alignment shapes Australia's China policy in an era of great power rivalry
Zanxu Pu
2026-09-09 · DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiag121Does limited force violate international law? A legal perspective on jus ad vim
Agata Kleczkowska
2026-09-09 · DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiag052Jus ad vim at 20: on the continued relevance of force-short-of-war
Christian Nikolaus Braun, Daniel R Brunstetter, Esther D Reed
2026-09-09 · DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiag125Reviews
Community Reviews
Version History
September 8, 2026 at 12:02 am
September 8, 2026