
Academic Journal
Q1International Data Privacy Law
About International Data Privacy Law
About International Data Privacy Law
International Data Privacy Law is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal published by Oxford University Press (United States). It focuses on Q1. Publication coverage spans 2011-2025.
Key indicators: ISSN 2044-3994, 2044-4001; H-index 35.
Understanding This Journal's Metrics
Journal metrics help researchers assess fit, but they must be interpreted in context:
- H-index (35): 35 articles have each received at least 35 citations, indicating growing recognition.
Publishing in International Data Privacy Law
When considering this journal, verify its current indexing status, editorial board, and recent publications to ensure it meets your needs for visibility and credibility.
- Scope fit: Confirm your research aligns with Q1. Off-scope manuscripts are typically desk-rejected quickly.
- Author guidelines: Follow formatting, reference style, and article-type requirements exactly — non-compliant manuscripts may be returned without review.
- Submission: Submit via the official journal website.
Is This Journal Right for Your Paper?
- Audience match: Will the journal's readers cite and build on your findings?
- Timeline: Higher-tier journals mean longer review and higher rejection risk. Balance prestige against your schedule.
- Indexing: Confirm indexing in Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed (if biomedical) meets your institutional requirements.
- Open access needs: Check funder mandates and whether the journal offers compliant OA options.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the ISSN of International Data Privacy Law?
2044-3994, 2044-4001.
Who publishes International Data Privacy Law?
Oxford University Press.
What are International Data Privacy Law's metrics?
H-index 35.
Where do I submit to International Data Privacy Law?
Via the official website.
Is International Data Privacy Law peer-reviewed?
Yes — it is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal indexed in major academic databases.
Source-backed journal facts
Topics in published research
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection; European Criminal Justice and Data Protection; Digitalization, Law, and Regulation; Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data; Freedom of Expression and Defamation; COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing.
OpenAlex classifies topics from published works. These topics are not the publisher’s official aims and scope.
Reported open-access list prices
4,291.00 EUR
APC list prices reported by OpenAlex, which obtains this information from DOAJ. Confirm current charges, taxes, waivers and eligibility with the publisher; this is not a fee quotation.
Source: OpenAlex source record. Retrieved 2026-10-03. Source record updated 2026-10-02. OpenAlex metrics are different from SCImago metrics and the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.
Journal Metrics
Quartile, SJR and the listed SCImago H-index use the 2025 imported SCImago dataset. A quartile may vary by subject category. Values without a source or reporting year are unverified historical entries. Verify the current Journal Impact Factor with Clarivate or the publisher before using it.
Aims & Scope
The publisher’s official aims and scope have not yet been verified for this profile. Use the journal website to check subject fit and accepted article types before submitting.
Recent Research Articles
Latest publications matched automatically by ISSN.
Bridging the deterrence deficit: constructing a punitive damages regime for China’s Personal Information Protection Law
Xinlei Wang, Jiaxin Jia
2026-09-22 · DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipag019Inferential privacy and the duty of data loyalty
Xi Chen, Weijie Huang
2026-09-22 · DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipag020Retraction of: Bridging the public–private divide: regulating data-centric utilities under China’s Personal Information Protection Law
2026-09-22 · DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipag021Experimental hybridism within filtered legal transplantation: Vietnam’s personal data protection law in comparative perspective
Thi Tue Phuong Hoang, Thi Lan Anh Do
2026-09-22 · DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipag018Personal data sharing agreements and arrangements: international and European human rights standards and the UK
Elspeth Guild, Catriona Barclay
2026-09-22 · DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipag022Securing borders, saving lives? The humanitarian-security paradox of Eurosur
Irene Baceiredo Macho
2026-09-22 · DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipag023The datafication by Frontex: unpacking (joint) controllership
Sarah Tas
2026-09-22 · DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipag017Personal data protection in Georgian higher education accreditation: redress, retention, and targeted reforms
Mikheil Bichia
2026-09-22 · DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipag024Certifying cross-border data flows: China’s dual-level approach beyond the GDPR and CBPR models
Jinping Zhang
2026-07-03 · DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipag015Expression of Concern: Bridging the public–private divide: regulating data-centric utilities under China’s Personal Information Protection Law
2026-07-03 · DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipag013A grounded theory study of data governance at the local legislative level in China
Wenjie Huang, Zhuoren Shao
2026-07-03 · DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipag014Gatekeeping privacy in the algorithmic society: rethinking China’s platform compliance regime
Wei Wang
2026-05-20 · DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipag003Sensitive data and the criminal sphere in Brazil
Victoria L Bezerra
2026-05-20 · DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipag005Anonymization in healthcare AI under GDPR: measurable privacy protection and global implications
Jui Jen Peng, I-Chun Chen
2026-05-20 · DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipag002How the Legal Basis for AI Training is Framed in Data Protection Guidelines and Interventions: Comparative Perspectives and the Prospect of Global Convergence
Wenlong Li, Yueming Zhang, Qingqing Zheng, Aolan Li et al.
2026-05-20 · DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipaf032The EU GDPR and secondary use of health and genetic data for research support purposes
Regina Becker, Edward S Dove
2026-05-20 · DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipag001RETRACTED: Bridging the public–private divide: regulating data-centric utilities under China’s Personal Information Protection Law
Nan Xia
2026-05-20 · DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipaf034Comparing and contrasting the definitions of genetic data in Chinese and EU law
Ruoxin Su, Paul Quinn
2026-05-20 · DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipaf036Evolving approaches to cross-border data flows: Latin American and African perspectives
María Vásquez Callo-Müller, Franziska Sucker
2026-05-20 · DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipaf037Permitted by design? Article 10(5) AIA, sensitive data, and the legal illusion of bias correction
Arnoud Engelfriet
2026-05-19 · DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipaf035Reviews
Community Reviews
Version History
October 9, 2026 at 8:59 pm
October 2, 2026