Academic Journal
Q1Journal of Legal Analysis
About Journal of Legal Analysis
About Journal of Legal Analysis
Journal of Legal Analysis is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal published by Oxford University Press (United States). It focuses on Q1. Publication coverage spans 2013-2017, 2019-2022, 2024-2026.
Key indicators: ISSN 2161-7201, 1946-5319; H-index 21.
Understanding This Journal's Metrics
Journal metrics help researchers assess fit, but they must be interpreted in context:
- H-index (21): 21 articles have each received at least 21 citations, indicating growing recognition.
Publishing in Journal of Legal Analysis
When considering this journal, verify its current indexing status, editorial board, and recent publications to ensure it meets your needs for visibility and credibility.
- Scope fit: Confirm your research aligns with Q1. Off-scope manuscripts are typically desk-rejected quickly.
- Author guidelines: Follow formatting, reference style, and article-type requirements exactly — non-compliant manuscripts may be returned without review.
Is This Journal Right for Your Paper?
- Audience match: Will the journal's readers cite and build on your findings?
- Timeline: Higher-tier journals mean longer review and higher rejection risk. Balance prestige against your schedule.
- Indexing: Confirm indexing in Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed (if biomedical) meets your institutional requirements.
- Open access needs: Check funder mandates and whether the journal offers compliant OA options.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the ISSN of Journal of Legal Analysis?
2161-7201, 1946-5319.
Who publishes Journal of Legal Analysis?
Oxford University Press.
What are Journal of Legal Analysis's metrics?
H-index 21.
Is Journal of Legal Analysis peer-reviewed?
Yes — it is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal indexed in major academic databases.
Open-access policies and author information
Reported in the official DOAJ public CSV snapshot (2026-09-01), downloaded 2026-10-03. Record updated 2022-09-22. This snapshot does not establish today’s listing status or fee quotation.
Publisher policy links recorded by DOAJ
- Aims and scope ↗
- Editorial board ↗
- Instructions for authors ↗
- Peer-review policy ↗
- Publication fees ↗
- Licence terms ↗
- Copyright policy ↗
- Preservation policy ↗
Source: DOAJ journal record. Journal metadata is distributed by DOAJ under CC0. Confirm current fees, tax, eligibility and waiver terms with the publisher.
Source-backed journal facts
Topics in published research
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems; Legal and Constitutional Studies; Judicial and Constitutional Studies; Legal principles and applications; American Constitutional Law and Politics; Corporate Finance and Governance.
OpenAlex classifies topics from published works. These topics are not the publisher’s official aims and scope.
Source: OpenAlex source record. Retrieved 2026-10-03. Source record updated 2026-10-02. OpenAlex metrics are different from SCImago metrics and the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.
Journal Metrics
Quartile, SJR and the listed SCImago H-index use the 2025 imported SCImago dataset. A quartile may vary by subject category. Values without a source or reporting year are unverified historical entries. Verify the current Journal Impact Factor with Clarivate or the publisher before using it.
Aims & Scope
The publisher’s official aims and scope have not yet been verified for this profile. Use the journal website to check subject fit and accepted article types before submitting.
Recent Research Articles
Latest publications matched automatically by ISSN.
Correction to: How do judges use large language models? Evidence from Shenzhen
2025-03-07 · DOI: 10.1093/jla/laaf002The Pervasive Influence of Political Composition on Circuit Court Decisions
Alma Cohen
2025-03-07 · DOI: 10.1093/jla/laaf004Election law for the new electorate
Nicholas O Stephanopoulos
2025-03-07 · DOI: 10.1093/jla/laaf003A Bipartisan Approach to Political Prosecutions
Ian Ayres, Saikrishna Bangalore Prakash
2024-01-01 · DOI: 10.1093/jla/laae006Large Legal Fictions: Profiling Legal Hallucinations in Large Language Models
Matthew Dahl, Varun Magesh, Mirac Suzgun, Daniel E Ho et al.
2024-01-01 · DOI: 10.1093/jla/laae003Strategic Incentives for Adopting the Global Minimum Tax
Wei Cui
2024-01-01 · DOI: 10.1093/jla/laae008Putting Freedom of Contract in its Place
Rebecca Stone
2024-01-01 · DOI: 10.1093/jla/laae004The Limits of Formalism in the Separation of Powers
Shalev Gad Roisman
2024-01-01 · DOI: 10.1093/jla/laae007How do judges use large language models? Evidence from Shenzhen
John Zhuang Liu, Xueyao Li
2024-01-01 · DOI: 10.1093/jla/laae009The Countercyclical Benefits of Regulatory Costs
Alexander Mechanick, Jacob Weber
2024-01-01 · DOI: 10.1093/jla/laae005The Original Presidency: A Conception of Administrative Control
Ilan Wurman
2024-01-01 · DOI: 10.1093/jla/laae002How Crime Shapes Insurance and Insurance Shapes Crime
Tom Baker, Anja Shortland
2023-09-01 · DOI: 10.1093/jla/laad002Remote Work and City Decline: Lessons From the Garment District
Clayton P Gillette
2023-09-01 · DOI: 10.1093/jla/laad004Finding Facts in Medieval English Law
Elizabeth Papp Kamali
2023-09-01 · DOI: 10.1093/jla/laad009Privacy Protection, At What Cost? Exploring the Regulatory Resistance to Data Technology in Auto Insurance
Omri Ben-Shahar
2023-09-01 · DOI: 10.1093/jla/laad008The Promise of Bargaining Protocols
Shay Lavie, Avraham Tabbach
2023-09-01 · DOI: 10.1093/jla/laad006Corporate Governance Welfarism
Marcel Kahan, Edward Rock
2023-09-01 · DOI: 10.1093/jla/laad007Algorithmic Harm in Consumer Markets
Oren Bar-Gill, Cass R Sunstein, Inbal Talgam-Cohen
2023-09-01 · DOI: 10.1093/jla/laad003Women in U.S. Law Schools, 1948–2021
Elizabeth D Katz, Kyle Rozema, Sarath Sanga
2023-09-01 · DOI: 10.1093/jla/laad005Settlement Around the World: Settlement Rates in the Largest Economies
Yun-chien Chang, Daniel Klerman
2022-09-01 · DOI: 10.1093/jla/laac006Reviews
Community Reviews
Version History
October 9, 2026 at 8:02 pm
September 25, 2026