Academic Journal
Q1New Review of Academic Librarianship
About New Review of Academic Librarianship
About New Review of Academic Librarianship
New Review of Academic Librarianship is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal published by 209 (United Kingdom). It focuses on Q1. Publication coverage spans 1995-2026.
Key indicators: ISSN 1361-4533, 1740-7834; H-index 30; Impact Factor 1.5.
Understanding This Journal's Metrics
Journal metrics help researchers assess fit, but they must be interpreted in context:
- H-index (30): 30 articles have each received at least 30 citations, indicating growing recognition.
- Impact Factor (1.5): Average citations per recent article. Interpret alongside field-specific citation norms.
Publishing in New Review of Academic Librarianship
When considering this journal, verify its current indexing status, editorial board, and recent publications to ensure it meets your needs for visibility and credibility.
- Scope fit: Confirm your research aligns with Q1. Off-scope manuscripts are typically desk-rejected quickly.
- Author guidelines: Follow formatting, reference style, and article-type requirements exactly — non-compliant manuscripts may be returned without review.
- Submission: Submit via the official journal website.
Is This Journal Right for Your Paper?
- Audience match: Will the journal's readers cite and build on your findings?
- Timeline: Higher-tier journals mean longer review and higher rejection risk. Balance prestige against your schedule.
- Indexing: Confirm indexing in Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed (if biomedical) meets your institutional requirements.
- Open access needs: Check funder mandates and whether the journal offers compliant OA options.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the ISSN of New Review of Academic Librarianship?
1361-4533, 1740-7834.
Who publishes New Review of Academic Librarianship?
209.
What are New Review of Academic Librarianship's metrics?
Impact Factor 1.5; H-index 30.
Where do I submit to New Review of Academic Librarianship?
Via the official website.
Is New Review of Academic Librarianship peer-reviewed?
Yes — it is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal indexed in major academic databases.
Verified field sources
- Journal Impact Factor: 1.5 — Official source; checked 2026-10-03. Publisher-reported Journal Impact Factor and year from Taylor & Francis About this journal information.
- Impact Factor year: 2025 — Official source; checked 2026-10-03. Publisher-reported Journal Impact Factor and year from Taylor & Francis About this journal information.
Source-backed journal facts
Topics in published research
Library Science and Information Literacy; Web and Library Services; Library Science and Administration; Library Collection Development and Digital Resources; Research Data Management Practices; Digital and Traditional Archives Management.
OpenAlex classifies topics from published works. These topics are not the publisher’s official aims and scope.
Source: OpenAlex source record. Retrieved 2026-10-03. Source record updated 2026-10-02. OpenAlex metrics are different from SCImago metrics and the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.
Journal Metrics
Quartile, SJR and the listed SCImago H-index use the 2025 imported SCImago dataset. A quartile may vary by subject category. Values without a source or reporting year are unverified historical entries. Verify the current Journal Impact Factor with Clarivate or the publisher before using it.
Aims & Scope
The publisher’s official aims and scope have not yet been verified for this profile. Use the journal website to check subject fit and accepted article types before submitting.
Recent Research Articles
Latest publications matched automatically by ISSN.
Managing Local Journals in Africa: Challenges and Implications for Sustainable Research
Theophilus Kwamena Ocran, Mac-Anthony Cobblah, Kwaku Anhwere Baafi, Kwame Kodua-Ntim et al.
2026-10-06 · DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2026.2742164Z-Library and Full-Text Access: Democratizing Knowledge or Undermining Copyright Ethics?
Ayooluwa Aregbesola, Sola Emmanuel Owolabi
2026-10-06 · DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2026.2742162Mapping research support services in university libraries of Pakistan: an assessment through university library websites
Sanila Aslam, Muhammad Arif
2026-09-18 · DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2026.2732867Thriving in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: A Study of Academic Librarians’ Perceptions and Apprehensions for Smart Libraries in Pakistan
Amara Malik, Sana Sana
2026-09-17 · DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2026.2732870Indigenizing Openness: Open Educational Resources in Aotearoa for Equity and Inclusion
Anne Goulding, Namali Suraweera, Alice Horsham
2026-09-17 · DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2026.2732868Designing for Engagement: Exploring Undergraduate Preferences and Use of Digital Library Resources through a User-Centered Design Lens
Chidi Segun-Adeniran, Bunmi Gabriel Alegbeleye, Ruth Owolabi, Buraimo Olayinka et al.
2026-07-12 · DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2026.2694972Adoption of AI Chatbots for Reference Services in University Libraries in Ghana: A Diffusion of Innovations Perspective
Samuel Owusu-Ansah, Samuel Asare Ampofo, Sylvia Edem Amexo
2026-07-08 · DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2026.2694974Preparing library and information science (LIS) students for scholarly communication librarianship: Assessing course objectives
Meti Tmava
2026-06-26 · DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2026.2694973Core technology competencies and their impact on task performance among academic librarians: Evidence from Pakistani public universities
Muhammad Asif Ali, Alia Arshad, Muhammad Rafiq
2026-03-18 · DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2026.2638184Fostering metaliteracy skills among university librarians: Challenges in the digital age
Sanila Aslam, Pervaiz Ahmad
2026-03-14 · DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2026.2638193Transforming Reference Services through ChatGPT: Insights from University Libraries in Taiwan
Shih-Chuan Chen
2026-01-02 · DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2025.2586271The influence and function of libraries and librarians on research outputs of universities and higher education institutions: a literature review
Maryam Okhovati, MohammadReza Chashmyazdan, Mousa Bamir
2026-01-02 · DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2025.2545984Digital Skills Competencies Among University Librarians in Islamabad, Pakistan
Abid Hussain, Muhammad Rafiq, Rafiq Ahmad
2026-01-02 · DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2025.2545985Big Data, Chatbots, and Data Mining: Transforming Academic Libraries – A Bibliometric Analysis
Md. Nurul Islam, Md Khairul Islam, Walton Wider, Sujin Butdiswan et al.
2026-01-02 · DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2025.2544531The Role of Digital Technology in Transforming Academic Library Services: A Systematic Literature Review
Iwin Ardyawin, Rahma Sugihartati, Agus Danugroho
2025-10-02 · DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2025.2524806Female Librarians’ Perceptions of Supervisory Leadership Styles in South-West Nigerian Universities
Adetola Adebisi Akanbiemu, Cecilia Funmilayo Daramola
2025-10-02 · DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2025.2528748Leave No one Behind: Empowering Librarians with AI Skills and Competencies in the Libraries of 5IR
Bolaji David Oladokun, Fatimah Jibril Abduldayan, Adetola Adebisi Akanbiemu
2025-10-02 · DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2025.2524795Research Literacy Programs in University Libraries of Pakistan: Challenges and Implementing Strategies
Sanila Aslam, Amjid Khan, Pervaiz Ahmad
2025-10-02 · DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2025.2524801Bibliometric Analysis of Smartphone Adoption and Its Impact on Academic Library Services
Md. Nurul Islam, Shakil Ahmad, Altaf Ali, Mushahid Ali et al.
2025-10-02 · DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2025.2491336Integrating CAVAL Competencies and the Five-Factor Model for Library and Information Science Professionals in Higher Education
Sujata Mandal, Parthasarathi Mukhopadhyay, Sibsankar Jana
2025-10-02 · DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2025.2491320Reviews
Community Reviews
Version History
October 10, 2026 at 1:17 am
October 2, 2026