Academic Journal
Q1Reproductive BioMedicine Online
About Reproductive BioMedicine Online
About Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Reproductive BioMedicine Online is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal published by Elsevier Ltd (United Kingdom). It focuses on Q1. Publication coverage spans 2000-2026.
Key indicators: ISSN 1472-6483, 1472-6491; H-index 146.
Understanding This Journal's Metrics
Journal metrics help researchers assess fit, but they must be interpreted in context:
- H-index (146): Exceptionally high — 146 articles have each been cited at least 146 times. This indicates deep, sustained influence in the field.
Publishing in Reproductive BioMedicine Online
An established venue in its field. The journal welcomes solid, well-executed research. Ensure your manuscript fits the stated scope and follows author guidelines carefully.
- Scope fit: Confirm your research aligns with Q1. Off-scope manuscripts are typically desk-rejected quickly.
- Author guidelines: Follow formatting, reference style, and article-type requirements exactly — non-compliant manuscripts may be returned without review.
Is This Journal Right for Your Paper?
- Audience match: Will the journal's readers cite and build on your findings?
- Timeline: Higher-tier journals mean longer review and higher rejection risk. Balance prestige against your schedule.
- Indexing: Confirm indexing in Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed (if biomedical) meets your institutional requirements.
- Open access needs: Check funder mandates and whether the journal offers compliant OA options.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the ISSN of Reproductive BioMedicine Online?
1472-6483, 1472-6491.
Who publishes Reproductive BioMedicine Online?
Elsevier Ltd.
What are Reproductive BioMedicine Online's metrics?
H-index 146.
Is Reproductive BioMedicine Online peer-reviewed?
Yes — it is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal indexed in major academic databases.
Source-backed journal facts
Topics in published research
Reproductive Biology and Fertility; Ovarian function and disorders; Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy; Reproductive Health and Technologies; Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics; Sperm and Testicular Function.
OpenAlex classifies topics from published works. These topics are not the publisher’s official aims and scope.
Reported open-access list prices
3,650.00 USD; 3,410.00 EUR; 2,920.00 GBP; 452,710.00 JPY
APC list prices reported by OpenAlex, which obtains this information from DOAJ. Confirm current charges, taxes, waivers and eligibility with the publisher; this is not a fee quotation.
Source: OpenAlex source record. Retrieved 2026-10-03. Source record updated 2026-10-02. OpenAlex metrics are different from SCImago metrics and the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.
Journal Metrics
Quartile, SJR and the listed SCImago H-index use the 2025 imported SCImago dataset. A quartile may vary by subject category. Values without a source or reporting year are unverified historical entries. Verify the current Journal Impact Factor with Clarivate or the publisher before using it.
Aims & Scope
The publisher’s official aims and scope have not yet been verified for this profile. Use the journal website to check subject fit and accepted article types before submitting.
Recent Research Articles
Latest publications matched automatically by ISSN.
Artificial intelligence-derived MAGENTA™ oocyte scores are associated with embryo development and cumulative freeze-all ICSI outcomes
Amanda Setti, Daniela Braga, Maite del Collado, Assumpto Iaconelli et al.
2026-12 · DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2026.105937Harvesting the outlier: developmental potential of oocytes from early dominant follicles in women with a low ovarian reserve
Barbara Lawrenz, Hamidreza Didar, Baris Ata, Laura Marqueta et al.
2026-12 · DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2026.105980Hyaluronidase source and ICSI outcomes: a paired donor-oocyte study
Sergi Novo, Lidia Morente, Judit Guix, Giulia Tribbioli et al.
2026-12 · DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2026.105958More abstracts, more science? Conference visibility and evidence maturity in reproductive medicine
Fadi Choucair, Alex C. Varghese, Maha Al-Asmakh, Carin Huyser et al.
2026-12 · DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2026.105959Dyslipidaemia is negatively associated with fertility, pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in women undergoing IVF treatment
Zheng Wang, Ying Song, Yan Song, Yuanyuan Wang et al.
2026-12 · DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2026.105963Pregnancy from implantation: clinical utility and residual ambiguity in reproductive terminology
Maria Luisa Di Pietro, Lucrezia Massaro, Giacomo Corrado
2026-12 · DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2026.105969De-novo mutation burden in ART-conceived offspring: no overall increase but subgroup differences by fertilization and transfer strategy
Yingming Zheng, Chuanping Lin, Qijing Wang, Wen-Jing Wang et al.
2026-12 · DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2026.105973Hysteroscopic metroplasty for dysmorphic uterus: form over function?
Bulent Urman, Ece Aksakal, Irem Usta, Engin Turkgeldi et al.
2026-12 · DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2026.105924Chronic endometritis and recurrent implantation failure: prevalence, diagnostic approaches and therapeutic strategies – a systematic review
Antonio D’Amato, Andres Reig, Andrea Etrusco, Vittorio Agrifoglio et al.
2026-12 · DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2026.105936Dual calcium ionophore oocyte activation after ICSI in globozoospermia: fertilization and cumulative live birth outcomes
Ahmad Mustafa Metwalley, Nabeel Brasha, Salman Aldakhilallah, Majed AlHudHud et al.
2026-12 · DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2026.105938Optimization of natural cycle frozen embryo transfer protocols remains an ongoing challenge due to methodological limitations
Murat Erden, Sezcan Mumusoglu, Hakan Yarali
2026-12 · DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2026.105925What happens to cryopreserved embryos after couples separate? First UK cohort study on disposition decisions
Renata Finelli, Catarina Moreira, Carol Porta, Bhavna Raikundalia et al.
2026-12 · DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2026.105976Response to: Random-effects pooling does not resolve embryo-level clustering in the DNA fragmentation index–aneuploidy meta-analysis
Min Zou, Nur Amilyn Batrisyia Raffi, Mahanem Mat Noor
2026-12 · DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2026.105979Sperm mitochondrial DNA copy number exhibits higher longitudinal consistency than conventional semen parameters in a clinical cohort
Savni Sawant, Emily Houle, Elizabeth C. Cox, Ricardo P. Bertolla et al.
2026-12 · DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2026.105972Overnight hypothermic transportation of ovarian tissue prior to cryopreservation in a centralized cryobank of the FertiPROTEKT network
Jana Bender-Liebenthron, Iwona Scheliga, Dunja M. Baston-Buest, Jens Hirchenhain et al.
2026-12 · DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2026.105977An incomplete optimization: IVF directs AI at embryo laboratory while treatment discontinuation goes unmeasured
Demián Glujovsky, Claudia Schwarzstein Azar, Julieta Glujovsky, Agustín Ciapponi et al.
2026-12 · DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2026.105934Placental endocannabinoid metabolism and gene expression gestational age-related alterations across preterm and term birth
Tetiana Synova, Eva Cifkova, Antonin Libra, Ramon Portillo et al.
2026-12 · DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2026.105896Automation and autonomy in the IVF laboratory: concepts and implications for embryologists
Jacques Cohen, Gerardo Mendizabal-Ruiz, Giles Anthony Palmer, Giuseppe Silvestri et al.
2026-12 · DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2026.105920Random-effects pooling does not resolve embryo-level clustering in the DNA fragmentation index–aneuploidy meta-analysis
Tong Wang, Ran Tong, Siyuan Song
2026-12 · DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2026.105978Freeze-all versus fresh embryo transfer strategies in low-prognosis women: an emulated target trial study
Xiaoyu Zhang, Yan Li, Yan Fang, Danfeng Wang et al.
2026-12 · DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2026.105957Reviews
Community Reviews
Version History
October 9, 2026 at 8:02 pm
September 25, 2026