Skip to content
JournalsWorldThe Global Research Discovery Platform
SCHOLARLY PUBLICATION

12-year Survival of Composite vs . Amalgam Restorations

Niek J.M. Opdam, Ewald Maria Bronkhorst, Bas A.C. Loomans, M.C.D.N.J.M. Huysmans

📄 Abstract

Information about the long-term clinical survival of large amalgam and composite restorations is still lacking. This retrospective study compares the longevity of three- and four-/five-surface amalgam and composite restorations relative to patients’ caries risk. Patient records from a general practice were used for data collection. We evaluated 1949 large class II restorations (1202 amalgam/747 composite). Dates of placement, replacement, and failure were recorded, and caries risk of patients was assessed. Survival was calculated from Kaplan-Meier statistics. After 12 years, 293 amalgam and 114 composite restorations had failed. Large composite restorations showed a higher survival in the combined population and in the low-risk group. For three-surface restorations in high-risk patients, amalgam showed better survival.

📤 Share this page

Found this useful? Share it with your network.

✓ Link copied! Paste it on ResearchGate / Academia.edu