Skip to content
JournalsWorldThe Global Research Discovery Platform
SCHOLARLY PUBLICATION ✓ Open Access

Controversies in acute kidney injury: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Conference

Marlies Ostermann, Rinaldo Bellomo, Emmanuel A. Burdmann, Kent Doi, Zoltan Huba Endre, Stuart L. Goldstein, Sandra L. Kane‐Gill, Kathleen D. Liu, John Richard Prowle, Andrew Shaw, Nattachai Srisawat, Michael Cheung, Michel Y. Jadoul, Wolfgang C. Winkelmayer­, John A. Kellum, Sean M. Bagshaw, Erin Frazee Barreto, Azra Bihorac, Ilona Bobek, Josée Bouchard, Jorge Cerdá, Rajasekara M. Chakravarthi, Silvia De Rosa, Daniel T. Engelman, Lui G. Forni, Ulla K. Hemmilä, Charles A. Herzog, Eric A. J. Hoste, Sarah C. Huen, Kunitoshi Iseki

📄 Abstract

In 2012, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) published a guideline on the classification and management of acute kidney injury (AKI). The guideline was derived from evidence available through February 2011. Since then, new evidence has emerged that has important implications for clinical practice in diagnosing and managing AKI. In April of 2019, KDIGO held a controversies conference entitled Acute Kidney Injury with the following goals: determine best practices and areas of uncertainty in treating AKI; review key relevant literature published since the 2012 KDIGO AKI guideline; address ongoing controversial issues; identify new topics or issues to be revisited for the next iteration of the KDIGO AKI guideline; and outline research needed to improve AKI management. Here, we present the findings of this conference and describe key areas that future guidelines may address.

📤 Share this page

Found this useful? Share it with your network.

✓ Link copied! Paste it on ResearchGate / Academia.edu