SCHOLARLY PUBLICATION ✓ Open Access

GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes

📖 Journal of Clinical Epidemiology → 📅 2012-04-27 🔗 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.006

View Journal Profile → ⬇ Download PDF View Official Paper ↗

📄 Abstract

The abstract has not yet been added. Use the official source link for the complete publication record.

ℹ️ Publication Details

Journal: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Published: 2012-04-27
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.006
OpenAlex: W2107021177
Access: ✓ Open Access

📋 Cite This Paper

Gordon Henry Guyatt, Andrew David Oxman, Shahnaz Sultan, Jan Brożek, Paul Glasziou, Pablo Alonso‐Coello, David C. Atkins, Regina Kunz, Víctor M. Montori, Roman Jaeschke, David M. Rind, Philipp Dahm, Elie A. Akl, Joerg J Meerpohl, Gunn Elisabeth Vist, Elise Berliner, Susan L. Norris, Yngve T Falck-Ytter, Holger Jens Schünemann (2012). GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.006

🔬 Related Research Papers

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Prognostic score–based balance measures can be a useful diagnostic for propensity score methods in comparative effectiveness research

Elizabeth A. Stuart, Brian K. Lee, Finbarr P. Leacy 2013-07-09 · Read paper → Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing Summary of Findings tables—binary outcomes

Gordon Henry Guyatt, Andrew David Oxman et al. 2012-05-22 · Read paper → Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Multimorbidity patterns: a systematic review

Alexandra Prados‐Torres, Amaia Calderón‐Larrañaga et al. 2014-01-25 · Read paper →

📄 Abstract

🔬 Related Research Papers

Cumulative complexity: a functional, patient-centered model of patient complexity can improve research and practice

Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program

Advances in the GRADE approach to rate the certainty in estimates from a network meta-analysis

The statistical significance of randomized controlled trial results is frequently fragile: a case for a Fragility Index

The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case report guideline development

ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies

GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing Summary of Findings tables and evidence profiles—continuous outcomes

Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0

In meta-analyses of proportion studies, funnel plots were found to be an inaccurate method of assessing publication bias

Prognostic score–based balance measures can be a useful diagnostic for propensity score methods in comparative effectiveness research

GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing Summary of Findings tables—binary outcomes

Multimorbidity patterns: a systematic review