Skip to content
JournalsWorldThe Global Research Discovery Platform
SCHOLARLY PUBLICATION ✓ Open Access

Randomized Phase III Study of Docetaxel Compared With Paclitaxel in Metastatic Breast Cancer

Stephen E. Jones, John Kalil Erban, Beth A. Overmoyer, G. T. Budd, Laura Fulper Hutchins, Elyse E. Lower, Leslie Rodgers Laufman, Srinand Sundaram, Walter J. Urba, Kathleen I. Pritchard, Robert Gary Mennel, Donald Richards, Steven R. Olsen, Marlene Meyers, Peter M. Ravdin

📄 Abstract

PURPOSE: This randomized, controlled, multicenter, open-label, phase III study compared docetaxel versus paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer that had progressed after an anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 449) were randomly assigned to receive either docetaxel 100 mg/m2 (n = 225) or paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (n = 224) on day 1, every 21 days until tumor progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. RESULTS: In the intent-to-treat population, both the median overall survival (OS, 15.4 v 12.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], 1.41; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.73; P = .03) and the median time to progression (TTP, 5.7 months v 3.6 months; HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.33 to 2.02; P < .0001) for docetaxel were significantly longer than for paclitaxel, and the overall response rate (ORR, 32% v 25%; P = .10) was higher for docetaxel. These results were confirmed by multivariate analyses. The incidence of treatment-related hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities was greater for docetaxel than for paclitaxel; however, quality-of-life scores were not statistically different between treatment groups over time. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel was superior to paclitaxel in terms of OS and TTP. ORR was higher for docetaxel. Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities occurred more frequently in the docetaxel group. The global quality-of-life scores were similar for both agents over time.

📤 Share this page

Found this useful? Share it with your network.

✓ Link copied! Paste it on ResearchGate / Academia.edu