Skip to content
JournalsWorldThe Global Research Discovery Platform
SCHOLARLY PUBLICATION ✓ Open Access

Shortfalls and Solutions for Meeting National and Global Conservation Area Targets

Stuart H. M. Butchart, Martin Clarke, Robert J. Smith, Rachel E. Sykes, Jörn P. W. Scharlemann, Mike B. J. Harfoot, Graeme M. Buchanan, Ariadne Angulo, Andrew P. Balmford, Bastian Bertzky, Thomas M. Brooks, Kent E. Carpenter, Mia T. Comeros‐Raynal, John Cornell, Gentile Francesco Ficetola, Lincoln Fishpool, Richard A. Fuller, Jonas Geldmann, Heather Harwell, Craig Hilton‐Taylor, Michael Hoffmann, Ackbar Joolia, Lucas Joppa, Naomi Kingston, Ian May, Amy Milam, Beth Polidoro, Gina M. Ralph, Nadia I. Richman, Carlo Rondinini

📄 Abstract

Abstract Governments have committed to conserving ≥17% of terrestrial and ≥10% of marine environments globally, especially “areas of particular importance for biodiversity” through “ecologically representative” Protected Area (PA) systems or other “area‐based conservation measures”, while individual countries have committed to conserve 3–50% of their land area. We estimate that PAs currently cover 14.6% of terrestrial and 2.8% of marine extent, but 59–68% of ecoregions, 77–78% of important sites for biodiversity, and 57% of 25,380 species have inadequate coverage. The existing 19.7 million km 2 terrestrial PA network needs only 3.3 million km 2 to be added to achieve 17% terrestrial coverage. However, it would require nearly doubling to achieve, cost‐efficiently, coverage targets for all countries, ecoregions, important sites, and species. Poorer countries have the largest relative shortfalls. Such extensive and rapid expansion of formal PAs is unlikely to be achievable. Greater focus is therefore needed on alternative approaches, including community‐ and privately managed sites and other effective area‐based conservation measures.

📤 Share this page

Found this useful? Share it with your network.

✓ Link copied! Paste it on ResearchGate / Academia.edu