Academic Journal
Q2Screen
About Screen
About Screen
Screen is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal published by Oxford University Press (United Kingdom). It focuses on Q2. Publication coverage spans 1969-2025.
Key indicators: ISSN 0036-9543, 1460-2474; H-index 39.
Understanding This Journal's Metrics
Journal metrics help researchers assess fit, but they must be interpreted in context:
- H-index (39): 39 articles have each received at least 39 citations, indicating growing recognition.
Publishing in Screen
When considering this journal, verify its current indexing status, editorial board, and recent publications to ensure it meets your needs for visibility and credibility.
- Scope fit: Confirm your research aligns with Q2. Off-scope manuscripts are typically desk-rejected quickly.
- Author guidelines: Follow formatting, reference style, and article-type requirements exactly — non-compliant manuscripts may be returned without review.
Is This Journal Right for Your Paper?
- Audience match: Will the journal's readers cite and build on your findings?
- Timeline: Higher-tier journals mean longer review and higher rejection risk. Balance prestige against your schedule.
- Indexing: Confirm indexing in Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed (if biomedical) meets your institutional requirements.
- Open access needs: Check funder mandates and whether the journal offers compliant OA options.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the ISSN of Screen?
0036-9543, 1460-2474.
Who publishes Screen?
Oxford University Press.
What are Screen's metrics?
H-index 39.
Is Screen peer-reviewed?
Yes — it is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal indexed in major academic databases.
Source-backed journal facts
Topics in published research
Cinema and Media Studies; Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism; Cultural Industries and Urban Development; Italian Fascism and Post-war Society; Human auditory perception and evaluation; Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies.
OpenAlex classifies topics from published works. These topics are not the publisher’s official aims and scope.
Reported open-access list prices
2,905.00 GBP
APC list prices reported by OpenAlex, which obtains this information from DOAJ. Confirm current charges, taxes, waivers and eligibility with the publisher; this is not a fee quotation.
Source: OpenAlex source record. Retrieved 2026-10-03. Source record updated 2026-10-02. OpenAlex metrics are different from SCImago metrics and the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.
Journal Metrics
Quartile, SJR and the listed SCImago H-index use the 2025 imported SCImago dataset. A quartile may vary by subject category. Values without a source or reporting year are unverified historical entries. Verify the current Journal Impact Factor with Clarivate or the publisher before using it.
Aims & Scope
The publisher’s official aims and scope have not yet been verified for this profile. Use the journal website to check subject fit and accepted article types before submitting.
Recent Research Articles
Latest publications matched automatically by ISSN.
(Im)material abstractions: visions of cryptocurrency in Ivar Veermäe’s The Flood (2018)
Toby Ashworth
2026-03-01 · DOI: 10.1093/screen/hjag004Jiří Anger, Towards a Film Theory from Below: Archival Film and the Aesthetics of the Crack-Up (Thinking Media Series)
Laurence Kent
2026-06-01 · DOI: 10.1093/screen/hjag012Recognising Southeast Asia through the making of a Nanyang Other: Hong Kong-produced Nanyang black magic films (1970s–1980s)
Min Hui Yeo
2026-09-01 · DOI: 10.1093/screen/hjag025(Kin)aesthetic, prosthetic: articulating fat realities on television
Abigail Jenkins
2026-06-01 · DOI: 10.1093/screen/hjag016‘They expected luxury’: condo media and condo mediation
Erica Stein
2026-03-01 · DOI: 10.1093/screen/hjag005Elena D. Hristova, Aimee-Marie Dorsten and Carol A. Stabile (eds), The Ghost Reader: Recovering Women’s Contributions to Media Studies
Barbara Mennel
2026-03-01 · DOI: 10.1093/screen/hjag002‘A stench in the ear’: sound and ethics in The Zone of Interest
Andrea Gyenge
2026-06-01 · DOI: 10.1093/screen/hjag020The question Oshima reconsidered
Naoki Yamamoto
2026-09-01 · DOI: 10.1093/screen/hjag031Scott Anthony, The Story of British Propaganda Film (British Screen Stories)
Christina Stojanova
2026-09-01 · DOI: 10.1093/screen/hjag035Becca Voelcker, Land Cinema in an Age of Extraction
Pat Brereton
2026-06-01 · DOI: 10.1093/screen/hjag017Deterritorialising Third Cinema
Masha Salazkina
2026-09-01 · DOI: 10.1093/screen/hjag028Screen and the global circulations of film theory Introduction
Sarah Cooper
2026-09-01 · DOI: 10.1093/screen/hjag027Contributors
2026-03-01 · DOI: 10.1093/screen/hjag009Darshana Sreedhar Mini, Rated A: Soft-Porn Cinema and Mediations of Desire in India (Feminist Media Histories Series)
Silpa Mukherjee
2026-06-01 · DOI: 10.1093/screen/hjag013The African Emancipation Library, Third Cinema, and the cinema and ideology debates: archaeologies of a desirable conversation
Aboubakar Sanogo
2026-09-01 · DOI: 10.1093/screen/hjag030Pooja Rangan, The Documentary Audit: Listening and the Limits of Accountability
Mustafa Uzuner
2026-03-01 · DOI: 10.1093/screen/hjag003Contributors
2026-06-01 · DOI: 10.1093/screen/hjag021Reformatting the stream: platformativity and the collapse of platform-area borders
Eason Lu
2026-03-01 · DOI: 10.1093/screen/hjag008In the margins of Screen : Latin America as structural absence and the challenge of international dialogue
David M J Wood
2026-09-01 · DOI: 10.1093/screen/hjag032Iain Macdonald and Paula Williams (eds), Designing the BBC: A History of Motion Graphics
Michael Betancourt
2026-03-01 · DOI: 10.1093/screen/hjag001Reviews
Community Reviews
Version History
October 10, 2026 at 1:31 pm
October 2, 2026